USTR Lighthizer responds to congressman’s criticism of U.S. ag and food system
June 17, 2020 By Ken Anderson Filed Under: Rural Issues, Trade
Today’s House Ways & Means Committee hearing on trade featured an interesting exchange between U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Representative Earl Blumenauer, a Democrat from Oregon.
In his testimony, Lighthizer discussed efforts to eliminate non-scientific trade barriers imposed on U.S. ag and food products by other countries. He was especially critical of the European Union’s claims that some U.S. food and ag products are unsafe, calling it “thinly-veiled protectionism”.
His comments were challenged by Blumenauer, who argued that the U.S. food production system has many flaws. He mentioned food safety and environmental concerns and cited as examples recent issues with meat processing facilities and crop farmers’ dependence on pesticides.
“Should we really export our weak standards to another
country who has legitimate public policy concerns and may provide better
protection,” Blumenauer said. “I think too often we hide behind requiring
science-based justification for other nations—sanitary and phytosanitary—without
allowing flexibility on values and public input.”
Lighthizer responded that while ag policy is not his area of expertise, “I would say the United States has the best agriculture in the world. It has the safest, highest standards and I think we shouldn’t confuse science with consumer preference. If consumers have a preference for one thing or another, they should certainly exercise their preference.
“What I’m going to do is try to insist on science-based restrictions—and
to the extent they have restrictions that are not science-based, we will object,”
Here is an excerpt of the exchange between Blumenauer and Lighthizer.
Your email address will not be published.
Subscribe for our newsletter today and receive relevant news straight to your inbox!