EPA tightening pesticide regulations under Endangered Species Act

Environmental groups are pushing the EPA to better comply with the Endangered Species Act when registering crop protection products.

Aaron Hager is a weed scientist with the University of Illinois. “This will have an impact on virtually every pesticide application that takes place in the future.”

He tells Brownfield there are several proposals the Environmental Protection Agency is working through. One proposed pilot project from the agency would limit pesticide applications across the entire range of habitat for the endangered Rusty Patch Bumblebee.

“Essentially, what the agency is proposing is there will be no outdoor pesticide application in the range of this insect. According to the agency’s own estimate, that would be in excess of 1,000,000 acres and the predominant areas that are going to be impacted by this include the state of Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota.”

He says over half of the 1700 species on the endangered list are plants, which is a major concern for herbicides.

“One of the most widely used herbicides that affects more plant species than anything else is glyphosate. There’s a lot of questions about what’s going to happen when the glyphosate undergoes re-registration.”

Hager says the ESA is already impacting products that farmers use, for example, the latest labels for Enlist One and Enlist Duo prohibit application in certain counties with known endangered species.

“Will that become more commonplace as we move forward and more herbicides are either registered or reregistered? The answer is yes, I’m fairly confident it will.”

He says farmers, commodity groups and retailers need to stay up to date on the agency’s proposals.

“There’s really no reason why anybody involved in agriculture across the United States should not be taking this very seriously ,looking at these documents, understanding these comment periods and offering comments to the agency.”

He says the EPA is receptive to comments that point out issues they have overlooked or offer solutions to allow the industry to continue using important pesticides.

Audio: Interview with Aaron Hager

  • About time their reducing the toxic chemicals being dumped into the environment. There is no safe levels. This stuff permeates the water, food supply, and the natural environment.

  • Glyfosate should be permanently banned throughout the entire world

    • Maybe you should try learning how to spell it before pontificating about it.

      • We are watching 8 species of oaks, the hickories, the red bud, box elder, elm, marsh mallows, summer phlox, ginseng, grapes, tomatoes, green beans, blackberries, Carolina rose ….. all curling up and dying over the past 6 years. (We only have a dozen Ash trees in this timber that may possibly become affected by Emerald Ash Borer).
        The leaf curl damage is pervasive throughout 7000 acres of timber in the oak/hickory macro-site forest here along the Kaskaskia River. The leaves are thick and green – not insect damage or any known diseases.

        We hear huge branches dropping to the ground on perfectly still afternoons. I am afraid to walk in our timber. We have lost 8 large trees around our home ($2000 expense to remove). I have watched them die slowly as their leaves cup, curl, twist into unrecognizable species. Experts have told me this is Herbicide Drift Damage (there are no apparent insect, disease or storm related causes). Forty acres inside this 7000 acre forest our tree leaves test with high levels of 2,4-d and dicamba.

        This is a REAL PROBLEM, it’s not a spelling error!
        These herbicides ARE NOT STAYING WHERE THEY ARE PUT. These herbicides DRIFT !! The manufacturers have not been able to reformulate their products to make them usable.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published.


Stay Up to Date

Subscribe for our newsletter today and receive relevant news straight to your inbox!