News

Are “Happy Cows” misleading?

California’s “Happy Cows” commercials are coming under fire…from the dairy industry. Speakers at a Cal-Poly dairy symposium this last weekend charged the “Happy Cows” campaign gives consumers the wrong idea. Bernard Rollins, and animal rights expert from Colorado State University said, “When consumers find out cows are on concrete instead of grass, consumers feel betrayed.”

Charlie Arnot with the Center for Food Integrity agreed saying these types of advertisements undermine the dairy industry’s credibility. Arnot says the industry does not need to hide from where it is today, “We should celebrate it!” He compared it to selling consumers the idea of a 1957 Chevy even though a 2010 Chevy is a much better vehicle.

Dairy Herd Management Editor Tom Quaite says the “Happy Cows” campaign came under fire a year-and-a-half ago at the American Dairy Science Association annual meeting when a University of Florida animal welfare specialist charged the ads cause consumers to get wrong expectations.

The “Happy Cows Come from California” campaign is the product of the California Milk Advisory Board.

  • We received the following response to this story from the California Milk Advisory Board:

    October 26, 2009

    Mr. Bob Meyer
    Brownfield Ag News

    Dear Mr. Meyer:

    As chairman of the California Milk Advisory Board, I have to go on record to say that we believe your recent coverage of the criticism of the California Happy Cows advertising campaign at the Cal Poly dairy symposium was at best one-sided.

    As a trade publication covering the dairy industry, our expectation would be that at the very least we should expect balanced coverage of an industry issue. Since no one from the CMAB was contacted to provide a perspective on the rationale behind the campaign, its objective, intent or impact, we are sincerely disappointed. The offer of comprehensive research data by Kris Costa of our CMAB staff to you Ms. Pierce following the symposium went unaccepted. Frankly, we feel that this smacks of sloppy journalism. In an effort to provide you with a more balanced perspective, I am compelled to take a moment to share the facts.

    The state and federal mandate for the CMAB is to promote and market California dairy products through communications, education and research. The Happy Cow advertising campaign is just that – an ad campaign. The campaign’s objective is to engage consumers, raise awareness about California milk products and drive consumer purchase. The campaign brings cows to life in an animated, whimsical and purposefully imaginary way. It engages consumers by giving cows human-like qualities and personalities. The campaign never intended – and is not meant to be a realistic representation of cows or actual dairy farms. And very importantly, consumers, including consumers who are animal rights activists understand that and are indeed engaged.

    In light of increased consumer concerns regarding animal welfare and recent legislative efforts such as Proposition 2 in California, at the beginning of this year, we asked our CMAB staff to conduct research to answer these very questions. Through a series of focus groups and an extensive, national, quantitative survey of 600 consumers we queried to understand the mindset of the consumer – including some self-described animal rights activists – as it related to this campaign. In conducting this research, we wanted to make sure without a doubt that the Happy Cow campaign was not setting any unrealistic expectations or in any way shedding a spotlight on “real” animal care issues.

    Respondents overwhelmingly expressed fondness for the Happy Cows campaign and viewed these advertisements as funny, designed to “sell” the idea of California dairy and not meant to accurately reflect reality. To quote just one verbatim, “I get it. Cows don’t really sing and dance and tell jokes, and they’re not all on beautiful pastures like that.” The commercials do not make people think about cow treatment. When questioned further, even the supporters of Proposition 2 defended the Happy Cows and did not feel that the advertisements should be discontinued in light of animal welfare concerns. Participants overwhelming agreed the campaign was a fun way to engage consumers and a humorous approach to sell California dairy products – that’s it. Respondents thought about dairy products, not animal treatment.

    What the Happy Cows campaign does succeed at however is to drive consumers’ awareness and engage them in a relationship with the CMAB. The campaign is driving consumers in record numbers to our website, where the CMAB does communicate the industry’s animal welfare practices in a transparent and authentic way: documentaries.

    At RealCaliforniaMilk.com we have profiled 13 dairies across the state where we discuss and show “the real story” of animal welfare and sustainability practices. We did this to make sure that consumers can see firsthand what it’s like to be at a California dairy and walk away with a better understanding of animal welfare practices. According to our research, documentaries are the most appropriate, credible forum to tell the real story; not advertising, which falls to the bottom of the list of credible sources of information regarding animal care and practices. I encourage you to review these videos available at RealCaliforniaMilk.com. We also provide information about the recent DMI certification program that California dairies are currently going through and fully support.

    The Happy Cows campaign is far more clever and strategic than it appears on the surface. And as our ongoing consumer tracking data shows, it has been the driver behind significant increases nationally in awareness of California as a source for dairy products and purchase intent for California dairy products – which remain, precisely, the intention of the advertising.

    It’s always disheartening when misinformation is spread, so I wanted to take a moment to share the strategy and intent behind the advertising campaign and also shed light on the other, more effective communication vehicles we have in place to communicate animal welfare practices.

    It is our hope that you will consider providing this information to your readers as readily as you did the story and opinions about the criticisms delivered last weekend. I would be happy to set up an opportunity for you to speak with our CMAB staff leadership and myself to answer any further questions you may have.

    Sincerely,

    Tony Souza
    Chairman
    California Milk Advisory Board

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published.


 

Stay Up to Date

Subscribe for our newsletter today and receive relevant news straight to your inbox!

Brownfield Ag News