Cyndi's Two Cents
Accountability in cattle country
October 15, 2019 By Cyndi Young Filed Under: AgriNews Column, Two Cents
Cattle prices dropped like a rock following the August 9 fire at the Tyson plant near Holcomb, Kansas. The plant processed about 6,000 head of fed cattle per day, which equates to 6 percent of the total U.S. fed cattle capacity. Many were shocked that closing a single plant could have that much of a negative ripple effect throughout cattle country.
The whispers I’ve heard for years
about packers having too much control over not only the vertically integrated
poultry and hog segments, but cattle as well, became louder and louder in days
following the fire. I’ve heard from so
many people who received ridiculously low prices for cattle they sold in the past
2 months. I’ve personally experienced it
as well. Prices weren’t so great to
begin with and then this big hit came and knocked the wind out of us all. . .
well, almost all of us. Packer margins
spiked in the days and weeks following the fire.
Western Ag Reporter trade publication and a cattle auctioneer from Montana who
called on fellow cow-calf producers and feeders to join in a social media
campaign #FairCattleMarkets to get the attention of President Donald Trump. Joe Goggins said the ever-widening gap between
packer profit margins and producer’s price for cattle has raised concern across
the countryside. It’s been going on for
more than 2 decades and its past time to do something about it. Goggins doesn’t claim to have all the
answers. He acknowledged that getting
rid of packers isn’t an answer, as they are needed. His hope is to get a
conversation started so the president understands there is a problem and to get
some fairness back in the market.
got the attention of a lot of cattlemen who were more than happy to participate. Somewhere along the way, however, other
groups with different motives seized control of the campaign and tried to make
it their own. #FairCattleMarkets didn’t
start out as a promotion for Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) or as an
anti-Beef Checkoff campaign. But it was
morphed into that and more.
One of the
things I detest about the way laws at the state and federal level are made is
the inclusion of non-related additions tossed in so a bill will pass. Many of us will support whole-heartedly the gist
of a bill until we find out what might be “buried” in it. That is what happened to the
been and will always be a proponent for promotion, research and education
funding for the beef industry. I do not
believe that an organization with strong ties to Humane Society of The United
States should have or expect to have a seat at the table when it comes to deciding
anything about production, promotion, education or research pertaining to beef cattle.
I do believe
that the National Beef Checkoff could do a better job communicating to those who
fund it. I do believe there is transparency
and accountability to cattle producers, but I don’t think most of us want to go
looking for it.
Your email address will not be published.
Subscribe for our newsletter today and receive relevant news straight to your inbox!