‘Egg bill’ not part of Senate Farm Bill draft

The initial draft of the Senate Farm Bill, released on Thursday, does not include the so-called “egg bill” language dictating cage size for egg-laying hens. 

It confirms earlier speculation that Senate Ag Committee chair Debbie Stabenow would drop her plan to include the controversial provision in the farm bill markup. But National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) vice president of government affairs Colin Woodall expects it to come up again during the farm bill process.

The president of the United Egg Producers (UEP), Chad Gregory, has been highly critical of NCBA and other ag groups who are fighting against the egg bill.  But NCBA’s Woodall maintains the legislation sets “a dangerous precedent”.

“And in Washington, D.C., precedent is everything,” Woodall says. “So even though this is a deal between UEP and HSUS, HSUS didn’t make any deals with us or the pork producers or anybody else in livestock—and they will use that precedent to eventually come after all of us.”

UEP’s Gregory says the egg bill is critical to the egg industry’s survival.  Woodall argues federal legislation is not UEP’s only option.

“If this is really what the egg industry wants, then there are other mechanisms that they can use to push for adoption among their members—other than making Congress do the dirty work and force it upon their members,” Woodall says.

UEP represents farmers who produce nearly 90 percent of the eggs in the U.S.

Link to earlier story and interview with Colin Woodall

NCBA official: Egg bill fight not over

Even though Senate Ag Committee chair Debbie Stabenow has apparently backed off on plans to incorporate the so-called “egg bill” language into the Senate Farm Bill markup, Colin Woodall of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) says the battle is far from over. 

“Late word is the language has been removed,” Woodall says. “But now we are worried about an amendment situation where an amendment could be offered either during the committee markup of the farm bill, or possibly on the floor of the Senate, that would also try to get that agreement put back in.

“So even though we’ve had kind of a short-term victory, it looks like, we’re still prepared to fight this as we move forward with the Senate Farm Bill process.”

Woodall disagrees with arguments put forth by United Egg Producers and the Humane Society of the United States that the egg bill only involves the egg industry.

“This sets a precedent of Congress dictating, or mandating, a production practice to all of us in livestock—and all of us in production agriculture—and that’s just unacceptable,” he says.

According to Woodall, who is vice president of government affairs for NCBA, the Senate Farm Bill markup is expected to take place this Thursday.

AUDIO: Colin Woodall (8:14 MP3)

Stabenow backs off, but egg bill fight is not over

Senate Ag Committee chair Debbie Stabenow has apparently backed off on plans to incorporate the so-called “egg bill” into the Senate farm bill markup. 

But Colin Woodall, vice president of government affairs for the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, tells Brownfield that the battle is far from over.

“Late word is the language has been removed,” Woodall says. “But now we are worried about an amendment situation where an amendment could be offered either during the committee markup of the farm bill, or possibly on the floor of the Senate, that would also try to get that agreement put back in.

“So even though we’ve had kind of a short-term victory, it looks like, we’re still prepared to fight this as we move forward with the Senate Farm Bill process.”

The Senate Farm Bill markup is expected to take place this week.

AUDIO: Colin Woodall (8:14 MP3)

Egg bill to be reintroduced

U.S. Representative Kurt Schrader of Oregon says he plans to reintroduce the so-called “egg bill” by the end of this month.

The legislation would set federal standards on cages for egg-laying hens. Schrader and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California sponsored companion bills in the last Congress requiring egg producers throughout the country to switch to larger cages for hens.

An aide to Schrader told the Capital Press that the congressman will attempt to attach the legislation to the farm bill. 

The egg bill is the result of a 2011 agreement between the Humane Society of the United States and United Egg Producers.  Other ag groups fear it could set a precedent for the federal government to impose production standards on other sectors of the livestock industry.

Egg bill called ‘a very, very scary proposition’

Tyson Redpath is a food and agriculture lobbyist with the Washington D.C. consulting firm The Russell Group.  A native of Ohio, Redpath has also served on the legislative staff of current Speaker of the House John Boehner, advising Boehner on policy matters concerning agriculture.

Speaking at the recent Governor’s Ag Conference in Kearney, Nebraska, Redpath called the so-called egg bill in Congress “a very, very scary proposition” and said that hog and cattle producers have good reason to be concerned about the bill.  Redpath believes it’s not just about eggs—it’s a platform for HSUS to pursue broader restrictions on animal ag production.  And he’s convinced that HSUS will attempt to attach the egg bill language to the next farm bill.

Brownfield’s Ken Anderson visited with Redpath.

AUDIO: Tyson Redpath (8:32 MP3)

Pacelle: Agriculture needs to stop the ‘carping’

The Humane Society of the United States was at the Indiana State Fair earlier this week along with representatives from United Egg Producers to tout the “success” of the HSUS/UEP agreement.  The proposed legislation would call for a national standard of production through federal regulations.

During a news conference on the grounds of the Indiana State Fair, Pacelle called the deal a “progressive, science based; pro-consumer; pro-farmer; pro-animal welfare agreement”.

He says the legislation is the next generation of egg farming in the United States.  “We’re here to talk about the merits of the agreement and to tell people to stop the complaining and stop the ‘carping’ by the rest of agriculture about something that is good for agriculture,” he says.  “You know for years HSUS has heard ‘why don’t you talk to farmers?’ or ‘why won’t you talk to farmers?’ well – that’s exactly what we’ve done.”

Pacelle notes the proposed HSUS-UEP legislation is a solution that a “vast number of egg farmers in the US support”.

Pacelle: NCBA should ‘stay in its lane’

The head of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)—Wayne Pacelle—says the reason his group is supporting a lawsuit against the beef checkoff is because of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association’s  (NCBA) opposition to the so-called “egg bill” in Congress.

“We’re very upset that NCBA is lobbying against progress and science and animal welfare within the laying hen industry,” Pacelle says. “We don’t want to see diversion of checkoff funds to lobby against good programs like the one called for in the HSUS-UEP agreement.”

Reminded that there are firewalls in place to prevent checkoff funds from being used for lobbying by NCBA, Pacelle says, “if that’s the case, then we have no quarrels at HSUS—and I would think that NCBA doesn’t have much to be worried about.

“Again, we’re not a plaintiff or a co-signer—we’re concerned about the misuse of checkoff funds, especially for lobbying purposes.”

The egg bill establishes cage size standards for egg laying hens.  NCBA says it could open the door to similar federally-mandated housing restrictions on other farm animal species. 

Pacelle disagrees and adds…

“We hope that the cattle industry stays in its lane and doesn’t continue to subvert the work of the egg industry to adopt progressive reforms that are good for the industry and align it better with consumer attitudes.”

At its annual meeting in Kansas City last week, the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) announced a new partnership with HSUS, which includes HSUS’ support of OCM’s lawsuit against the beef checkoff.

AUDIO: Wayne Pacelle (8:18 MP3)

 

 

UEP says deal with HSUS would bring uniform standards

The Senate Ag Committee heard testimony this morning on both sides of the “Egg Products Inspection Act Amendments of 2012” (S. 3239).  Supporters of the legislations say one of its biggest advantages is reducing uncertainty in the industry. 

Greg Herbruck, executive vice president of Michigan based Herbruck’s Poultry Ranch says because eggs travel across state lines – there needs to be a uniform standard.  “Our farm can’t maintain a separate hen-house standards for ever state where we want to sell eggs,” he says.  “That is pretty much where we’re headed with the current patchwork of laws that keep expanding.  Even already passed laws, Michigan’s standards differ from Ohio’s, which is different from Washington’s, which is different from Oregon’s and different from California.”

AUDIO: Greg Herbruck, Executive VP of Herbruck’s Poultry Ranch, (4:22mp3)

Amon Baer, owner of Mendelson Egg Company in Lake Park, MN says there are five reasons why they are in opposition of the bill.  “The bill will essentially kill the small family egg farmer; the bill will result in a dramatic increase in the cost of eggs to the consumer; the bill is not necessary; the bill would establish a precedent that could affect virtually all of the livestock industries; and finally S. 3239 is not justified by science.”

AUDIO: Amon Baer, Owner of Mendelson Egg Company (5:00mp3)

Following this morning’s hearing, Committee Chairwoman Stabenow said they are working to find common ground.

NPPC discusses ‘egg bill’ concerns

At World Pork Expo, the National Pork Producers Council has reaffirmed its strong opposition to the so-called “egg bill” in Congress.

NPPC refers to the bill, which would dictate cage size for egg laying hens, as the Federal Farm Takeover Bill. 

Discussing NPPC’s concerns at a Thursday morning news conference were NPPC chief veterinarian Dr. Liz Wagstrom; Nebraska pork producer and NPPC board member Bill Luckey; and NPPC vice president for domestic public policy Audrey Adamson.

AUDIO: NPPC news conference–Wagstrom, Luckey, Adamson (9:56 MP3)

 

Egg bill introduced in Senate

California Senator Diane Feinstein has introduced the controversial “egg bill” in the U.S. Senate.

The bill, which was previously introduced in the House, would establish a national standard for hen housing.  It would transition U.S. egg production away from conventional cages to enriched colony cages by the end of 2029.

The legislation stems from an agreement between United Egg Producers and the Humane Society of the United States.  Most major livestock organizations strongly oppose the legislation.  They say it could open the door to federal restrictions on other farm animal industries.

Meanwhile, another coalition of animal rights organizations is criticizing the egg bill for not going far enough. 

The groups, which include the Humane Farming Association and Friends of Animals, want all cages outlawed.  They have labeled the legislation “the Rotten Egg Bill”.