Missouri Right to Farm gets new life

The proposed right-to-farm constitutional amendment has been revived in the Missouri legislature after it stalled in the Missouri Senate earlier this week.

Kansas City Senator Jolie Justus had helped block the bill saying it needed to not only give farmers the right to farm but give local governments the authority to act on health, safety and environmental issues related to farming and ranching.  Now, she’s working to get that back into the proposal.

“Constitutionally we’ve set up political subdivisions under Article Six, so why don’t we refer to those in this thing and then have a streamlined sentence that basically says, ‘anything that the local political subdivisions already have they will continue to have,” says Senator Justus.

The bill has been sent back to a conference committee to add the local-control language.

Senate sponsor of the right to farm measure, Mike Parson, says that change can get the bill to next year’s ballot. If it passes in the remaining week of the legislative session, the amendment will go before Missouri voters in 2014.

~Missourinet News Director Bob Priddy contributed to this report~

MISSOURI RIGHT TO FARM HITS SNAG

Missouri Right to Farm hits snag

In a state where ag industry groups and legislators have successfully fought off animal rights activist measures, legislators are now stalled on a “right to farm” proposal designed to block any future activist threats.

Missouri House and Senate negotiators have advanced a proposed right-to-farm constitutional amendment which would go to the voters next year if passed. The Missouri House passed the measure on Wednesday.  But Senate Sponsor Mike Parsons has been unable to get a final vote and sooner or later, he says, the court system would decide what the right to farm means.

Parsons said, “We’ve tried to talk to corporate lawyers, to attorneys, to judges, everybody we could possibly think to say – ‘What does this mean? Is this good/bad?’ And, at the end of the day you could throw all the answers in a hat and nobody really knows.”

Senate Minority Leader Jolie Justus says she is FOR the right to farm but is opposed to the measure because it removes county control.

Senator Paul LaVota of Independence says he agrees, “Let’s not put something in the constitution that ties the hand of local control that a CAFO or any other type of operation can pollute the land, upset the neighbors, and then hide behind the constitution saying ‘I’m doing farming.’”

Senator Parsons promises to keep trying to advance the right to farm measure. The Missouri legislative session ends next Friday.

~Missourinet contributed to this report~

Indications House will take up a farm bill

The leadership of the U.S. House reportedly intends to bring a farm bill up for debate this summer, according to a memo from House Majority Leader Eric Cantor to House Republicans last Friday. Markup of a farm bill in the House Agriculture Committee could begin May 15th – according to Committee Chairman Frank Lucas.

Last year, that Committee passed a farm bill but it was never allowed to be brought to the House floor for debate by House leadership.

Meanwhile, the Senate Ag Committee could begin its farm bill markup as early as this week. At issue are concerns over the federal Egg Bill possibly being made a part of the measure, although there are reports that Senate Ag Chair Debbie Stabenow may be backing away from that idea.

Nebraska Senator Mike Johanns says that including the egg bill – which would require colony cages for all egg laying hens nationwide – would kill the farm bill as other livestock groups are opposed the measure crafted by the United Egg Producers (UEP) and the Humane Society of the U.S.

UEP president Chad Gregory says egg producers “desperately need a federal standard for egg production” which has nothing to do with any other livestock production.

Stabenow to include egg bill?

Senate Ag Committee Chair Debbie Stabenow reportedly plans to include the so-called Egg Bill, supported by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and the United Egg Producers (UEP), in her markup of the Farm Bill.

Agri-Pulse reports that the chairwoman’s staff told staff members of pork, beef, and turkey groups, and the American Farm Bureau on Tuesday that she was aiming to include Senate Bill 820, sponsored bya bipartisan group of senators, including Stabenow herself and Democrat Dianne Feinstein. A companion “egg” bill was introduced in the House, HR 1731. The ag groups are strongly opposed to the legislation which would set federal standards on cages for egg laying hens.

Stabenow worked last year to shut down similar legislation in the Senate-passed farm bill. Agri-Pulse says Stabenow has been at the receiving end of political pressure from the Michigan Agri-Business Association and others who support the bill. The Association says the bill is supported “by every commercial egg producer in Michigan.”

Stabenow has indicated markup of the farm bill in her committee could begin as early as May 9th.

OK Farm Bureau on horse processing law

The Oklahoma Farm Bureau strongly supports legislation recently signed by Oklahoma’s governor to allow horse processing in that state.

OFB President Mike Spradling says it’s about protecting the property rights of horse and other livestock owners amid the goal of the Humane Society of the United States and other animal rights activists to take that away.  Spradling tells Brownfield Ag News, “Today, that topic was equine. Our concern was tomorrow it could be poultry, beef, pork, any other species that we certainly have in production ag.”

Spradling says horse slaughter would be one option to the serious problem of neglected and abandoned horses caused by the previous federal ban on legal processing.  He stresses that horse processing would be an option, not a mandate, and is supported by breeding groups throughout Oklahoma.   He tells Brownfield, “Their policy is well understood. It’s not necessarily that they support or are in favor of horse processing. What most of the breed associations say is they are in favor of the owner of the horse having that option.”

Spradling says the lifting of the ban is a chance for the Humane Society of the United States to show some real concern.  He says, “You know here’s their opportunity. If they don’t want to see processing come into the state of Oklahoma have them come in and spend their money on pasture, on feed and care for these individual horses.”

The Oklahoma law takes effect November 1st and horse processing could only take effect if federal law continues to allow it and there’s funding for USDA inspectors. The meat would only be allowed for sale in the export market.

Spradling says Oklahoma was one of four states that banned horse slaughter, so now there are only three.

AUDIO: Mike Spradling (9:00 mp3) 

Oklahoma governor signs horse processing bill

Oklahoma’s Republican Governor Mary Fallin signed the horse slaughter bill Friday that was passed by that state’s Republican-led legislature earlier last week. Set to go into effect on November 1st, it ends the ban on slaughter of horses for human consumption which was made illegal in Oklahoma in 1963. It allows for the export of horse meat for sale, however, it strictly prohibits the sale of horse meat for human consumption in the U.S..

According to the Oklahoman’s News OK.com, more opponents to the measure contacted the governor’s office than supporters but the opposition was overwhelmingly from out of state.

The Oklahoma state director for the Humane Society of the United States, Cynthia Armstrong, urged the governor to veto the bill on Friday. She tells the paper that the HSUS “will continue to work toward banning the practice of horse slaughter nationwide through federal legislation” and will “look at every option” to prevent any horse slaughter plant from opening in Oklahoma.

The Oklahoma Farm Bureau is a strong supporter of the legislation from a property rights standpoint.

MO House passes Right to Farm measure

The Missouri House has passed a proposed Constitutional amendment meant to protect Missourians’ rights to farm and ranch using modern methods and equipment.

Representative Casey Guernsey, a Republican from Bethany, says if approved by voters, the amendment would make those rights clear. Speaking on the House floor, Guernsey asked, “Where can states like ours turn in perilous time such as these? Certainly not the federal government that has too often fallen prey to the nonsensical arguments of these animal rights radicals. That’s why it’s so important we pass HJRs 7 & 11 to protect Missouri’s right to farm in our state constitution.”

The proposal next goes to the Senate. If it is passed there, it would go to voters in November, 2014.  A similar measure was passed by voters in North Dakota last year, with more than 66% of the vote.

 

Int’l Equine Business Assoc. seeks to intervene in lawsuit

The International Equine Business Association, which was formed to restore and promote horse processing in the United States, has filed court documents to intervene in a lawsuit to defend a New Mexico meat plant that is attempting to begin horse processing.

IEBA Chairman Sue Wallis says the Valley Meat plant spent money to make big changes to its facility, laid off workers and met all requirements for lawful horsemeat processing over a year ago and has yet to receive federal inspectors from the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) to move forward. The lawsuit is attempting to force the USDA to provide inspectors to the plant.

Wallis says the case is complicated by the involvement of the Front Range Equine Rescue and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), animal rights activist groups that moved (this January) to intervene in the litigation filed by Valley Meat LLC against the USDA. Wallis says those groups are using various measures to try and prevent horse processing.

Right to farm, hunt advances in MO

The right to farm, raise livestock, hunt and fish are combined proposals that have passed the Missouri House Ag policy committee in an attempt to prevent animal rights activist groups from chipping away at those rights. Missouri Farmers Care Coalition Executive Director Dan Kleinsorge says coalition groups are pleased.

House Joint Resolutions 7 and 11, sponsored by Representatives Smith and Reibolt, were taken up from the work started by Representative Tom Loehner, who was ‘term-limited’ out last year.

“You know, this is not going to go away. This is something where we’re going to be targeted over and over and that’s why we need HJR 7 and 11 to establish some long-lasting constitutional protections for the right to raise livestock and practice modern farming techniques. Ultimately, what this protects are our consumer choice and our food choice, too.”

If passed by the Missouri House and Senate, the proposed constitutional amendment would go before Missouri voters in 2014.  Kleinsorge tells Brownfield Ag News another state has taken the same approach, “This is actually quite similar to a measure that North Dakota worked on. That was actually a ballot initiative that they did just last year and it passed very, very strongly. I believe about 63% in favor.”  Kleinsorge says they expect the measure will have good support in the Senate.

The Missouri Farmers Care Coaltion, made up major farming and similar groups, was formed to fight the HSUS-backed puppy mill ballot initiative several years ago.  Kleinsorge says the Humane Society of the United States has not said much about this effort, “We don’t know exactly what they’re up to now. They did not testify in opposition to HJR 7 & 11, yet. They’ll have another opportunity to do that in the future. So, we’re not sure what they’re up to right now but we’re always going to be keeping an eye on ‘em.”

The HSUS backed away from its Your Vote Counts campaign last year and Kleinsorge says that was another victory for Missouri agriculture.

HSUS CEO drops bid for Tyson board seat

HSUS President and CEO Wayne Pacelle has dropped his bid to run for a seat on Tyson Food’s board.  Pacelle announced in October he was seeking the seat to urge Tyson to phase the use of gestation stalls out of its supply chain.

According to MarketWatch.com a HSUS spokeswoman said because of Tyson’s dual-class voting structure, “it’s apparent that the company [Tyson] will use its voting power to reject Mr. Pacelle’s candidacy.” 

A spokesman for Tyson confirmed that Pacelle is no longer a board candidate and said “the nomination had zero effect on the company.”