Animal antibiotic bill introduced

Legislation that would, according to its sponsors, better monitor antibiotic use in food animals has been introduced in the U.S. House.

Representatives Louise Slaughter of New York and Henry Waxman of California introduced the bill. They say it would require drug manufacturers to provide better information to the FDA on how their drugs are used in food animals and improve the timing and quality of data the FDA releases. It will also require large-scale producers of poultry, swine and livestock to submit data to FDA detailing the type and amount of antibiotics contained in animal feed.

Slaughter, a frequent critic of antibiotic use in food animals, warns that America is “on the cusp of a monumental public health crisis…the end of antibiotics as a tool for fighting disease”.  Slaughter believes that antibiotic residue in meat is causing antibiotic resistance in humans.

NCBA pleased with ADT rule

The chief veterinarian for the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) says the group is pleased with the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) final animal disease traceability rule.

Kathy Simmons says NCBA is encouraged that many of the priorities of cattlemen and women have been considered in the final rule.

Simmons made her comments in an interview with Brownfield at the recent Cattle Industry Convention in Tampa.  She also provided an update on the use of  antibiotics and the latest rules from the FDA.

AUDIO: Kathy Simmons (3:38 MP3)

Energy drink ingredients and “cocktails”

As questions arise about the safety of energy drinks, what is actually in them?  Caffeine is the leading ingredient – and amounts can vary in energy drinks and so-called energy shots. Food Insight says they can have between 50 and 160 milligrams of caffeine per eight ounce serving but one drink falls in the category of moderate caffeine consumption. The potential problems lie in a person’s sensitivity to caffeine or any of the ingredients, pre-existing conditions like hypertension that can be made worse, over-consumption of the drinks, and, energy cocktails where they are mixed with alcohol.

HEALTHY LIVING PROGRAM – Energy Drinks & Shots overview (1:30 mp3)

FDA investigates adverse health effects of energy drinks and supplements

Food Insight

The Partnership – Energy drinks and children

Chamberlain Farms responds salmonella claims

An attorney for Chamberlain Farms says the salmonella outbreak that sickened 261 people in 24 states didn’t stem from their melon farm.  Last month the FDA sent a letter to the farm asking for details on how they had improved sanitary conditions at the packing house and farm after the multi-state outbreak.

According to the Princeton Daily Clarion, the farm’s legal counsel, Gary Zhao, issued an official statement that said testing from a microbiologist hired by the farm gives “overwhelming evidence” pointing to land adjacent to their Owensville, Ind. melon field as the possible source of the salmonella outbreak, and not the farm’s packing facilities, equipment, or operations. 

Testing done on salmonella collected at the farm by the FDA matched the DNA fingerprint of the salmonella strain responsible for the outbreak this summer.  Which, the FDA says makes it a source for at least some of the bacteria.

Zhao says the farm will continue to work with the FDA cooperatively.

Peanut plant linked to illness must comply

The New Mexico peanut butter plant linked to salmonella illnesses in 20 states has had the suspension imposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lifted. However, Sunland Incorporated of Portales, New Mexico will not be able to resume the process and distribution of food products until they comply with a federal judge’s consent decree.

Among the requirements in the decree is to hire an independent sanitation expert. Unsanitary conditions and improper manufacturing practices led to the salmonella contamination, according to federal inspectors.

Forty-two people became sick in the outbreak.

New antibiotic legislation to be introduced

Representative Henry Waxman of California says he plans to introduce new farm animal antibiotic legislation in the House of Representatives.

Waxman says his bill would improve the data that the Food and Drug Administration collects regarding antibiotics used in animal agriculture.  Specifically, it would require drug manufacturers to provide comprehensive information to the FDA on how their drugs are used on farms.

Currently, drug makers only report their total sales, but don’t have to distinguish which species the drugs are intended for or indicate what portion were used exclusively for food animals.

The bill would also, for the first time, require reporting by feed mills.

Waxman says the legislation will help expose the extent to which antibiotics are overused on farms and allow the FDA to take appropriate action.  He says more reliable information about antibiotic use is necessary, in his words, “so scientists and Congress can stop the spread of drug-resistant infections from farm animals to humans.”

Meanwhile, Waxman’s colleague, New York Representative Louise Slaughter,  promises to continue her push for a phase-out of certain antibiotics in farm animal production.

Livestock and meat groups say there is no scientific connection between antibiotic use in farm animals and antibiotic resistance in humans.

FDA finds unsanitary conditions on Indiana cantaloupe farm

An inspection report released by the US Food and Drug Administration found unsanitary conditions and salmonella at the farm that produced tainted cantaloupes that killed three people.  According to the Dow Jones Newswire, traces of salmonella were identified on cantaloupes pulled from the field at Chamberlain Farms in Owensville, Ind.  The FDA report also said salmonella was found on surfaces where the melons were washed, processed, and packed.

In addition to the salmonella contamination, FDA inspectors also documented unsanitary conditions, such as overflowing garbage cans near the area where cantaloupes were processed and packed and “an accumulation of black, green, and brown buildup” on the conveyor belts and rollers used to process the melons.

To date, 270 people in 26 states have been infected in the salmonella outbreak. 

On August 22, 2012, Chamberlain Farms issued a recall for all of the cantaloupes it produced this year.

Still educating consumers about implants

Consumer concerns about growth-promoting hormones used in beef have been around a long time but a beef specialist tells Brownfield growth promotants continue to be safe. Dan Loy, with Iowa State University Extension, says there has been intense government scrutiny on new compounds developed since DES was banned from use in humans and livestock in 1979, after it was found to be a carcinogen.

Loy says there’s a group of consumers very passionate about their food – and he respects that. Loy tells Brownfield Ag News, “Thirty years ago, right after the DES incident, there was a lot more consumer concern, perhaps even more than it is today. Today, the media is quicker and people can Google things and find out information a lot more quickly but the questions have been there for a long time.”

Loy says there are choices for consumers – that beef sold under the label “naturally raised” or “certified organic” must not have been raised with growth-promotants.

He points out that the amounts of hormones used in beef cattle are very small. Loy says, “The amounts are so miniscule, regardless of the source, whether it’s created synthetically or it’s exactly the natural product that’s produced in the anima –, the amounts are so small compared to what’s naturally produced, what comes from other sources in our food supply, it’s really not a significant health issue.”  For example, beans, bread, peanuts and eggs contain much higher levels.

The FDA regulates hormone implants — and residues of synthetic hormones are monitored routinely by the USDA’s Food Safety & Inspection Service (FSIS).

Without growth promotants that improve efficiency and lead to the tender beef that consumers want, Loy says consumers need to know that the price of beef would be much, much higher.

Understanding Hormone Use In Beef Cattle – Iowa Beef Center

Why are hormones used in beef production?

It starts with consumer preference.  Iowa State Beef Specialist Dan Loy explains that Americans have acquired a taste for tender beef from young steers and heifers. Most male bulls are neutered at a young to reduce those hormones that cause aggression – and that takes them from a bull to a steer – so they lose their natural hormones. Implants are small compressed pellets containing natural, synthetic or plant-based hormones imbedded into the cow’s ear. Loy says those very small amounts of hormones speed the growth and change the type of growth of cattle.

HEALTHY LIVING PROGRAM – Hormones in Beef (1:30 mp3)

Iowa Beef Center – Understanding Hormone Use in Beef Cattle

Bill would set limits for arsenic in rice

Three House Democrats have introduced a bill to limit the amount of arsenic allowed in rice and rice based products. The lawmakers base their proposed legislation on a recent investigation by Consumer Reports, which is the publication of the non-profit Consumers Union.

Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut says the researchers found “alarmingly high levels of arsenic” in those rice products and “the federal government has an obligation to every American family to ensure that the food they consume is safe and should not make them sick.” There are currently no federal standards for arsenic in foods but they exist for drinking water. There are no reports of illness directly linked to rice consumption.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says it has been and will continue to investigate arsenic – both naturally occurring and inorganic – in rice products but they do not recommend consumers stop eating it – adding that rice is an important, nutritious staple of the diet. FDA’s Deputy Commissioner for Foods, Michael Taylor, says they are looking at the potential long-term implications of arsenic levels in rice and other foods and drinks, which vary greatly, and any regulations must be solidly science-based.

DeLauro, along with Rep. Frank Pallone (D-New Jersey) and Rep. Nita Lowey (D-New York) are cosponsors of the RICE Act and also sponsors of the Apple Juice Act, introduced earlier this year that would require the FDA to set standards for arsenic and lead in fruit juices.