<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brownfield &#187; World Ag News/Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brownfieldagnews.com/category/news/world-ag-newstrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:44:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FAO trims Russian wheat estimate a little more</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/09/02/fao-trims-russian-wheat-estimate-a-little-more-2/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/09/02/fao-trims-russian-wheat-estimate-a-little-more-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=29878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization has reduce its wheat-output estimate for Russia by 10% and has raised its export estimates for the U.S. by 43% The drought prompted FAO to cut its projection for the Russian wheat crop this year by five million metric tons to 43 million tons. The new estimate is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization has reduce its wheat-output estimate for Russia by 10% and has raised its export estimates for the U.S. by 43% The drought prompted FAO to cut its projection for the Russian wheat crop this year by five million metric tons to 43 million tons.</p>
<p>The new estimate is lower than the USDA projection of 45 million tons and the International Grains Council&#8217;s figure of 44 million tons. The Russian crop was 60 million tons last year.</p>
<p>As a result, the FAO raised its U.S. wheat exports estimate in this marketing year to 33 million tons, an increase of 10 million tons from its outlook in June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/09/02/fao-trims-russian-wheat-estimate-a-little-more-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wheat pushes world food prices higher</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/09/01/wheat-pushes-world-food-prices-higher/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/09/01/wheat-pushes-world-food-prices-higher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grains/Oilseeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=29733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United Nations Food &#38; Agriculture Organization (FAO) says the sudden sharp rise in international wheat prices has pushed world food prices to their highest point in two years. The FAO Food Price Index increased five percent in August putting it at the highest point since September of 2008. However, it is still 38 percent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United Nations Food &amp; Agriculture Organization (FAO) says the sudden sharp rise in international wheat prices has pushed world food prices to their highest point in two years. The FAO Food Price Index increased five percent in August putting it at the highest point since September of 2008. However, it is still 38 percent below the peak it hit in June of 2008. Besides wheat, sugar and oilseeds contributed to the increase.</p>
<p>Read more from FAO<a href="http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/45006/icode/"> here</a>:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/09/01/wheat-pushes-world-food-prices-higher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ukraine sees no need to limit grain exports</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/25/ukraine-sees-no-need-to-limit-grain-exports/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/25/ukraine-sees-no-need-to-limit-grain-exports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=29187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to wire reports, the Ukrainian government says it sees no need to limit grain exports, as Russia decided to do after severe drought scorched wheat fields across the region.  However, a spokesman for Ukraine’s prime minister says no final decision has been made.  Speculation that Ukraine was considering imposing quotas on grain exports has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to wire reports, the Ukrainian government says it sees no need to limit grain exports, as Russia decided to do after severe drought scorched wheat fields across the region.  However, a spokesman for Ukraine’s prime minister says no final decision has been made. </p>
<p>Speculation that Ukraine was considering imposing quotas on grain exports has been a factor in soaring world wheat prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/25/ukraine-sees-no-need-to-limit-grain-exports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressional reaction to egg recall</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/24/congressional-reaction-to-egg-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/24/congressional-reaction-to-egg-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Harker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA/Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poultry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=29140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley says the massive recall of eggs suspected of salmonella contamination from two Iowa egg production companies might have been avoidable. “It’s my understanding that the Food and Drug Administration, about the time of the recall or about the time the eggs would have gone out, had issued some new regulations that probably would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iowa Senator <a href="http://grassley.senate.gov/">Chuck Grassley</a> says the massive recall of eggs suspected of salmonella contamination from two Iowa egg production companies might have been avoidable.</p>
<p>“It’s my understanding that the<a href="http://www.fda.gov/"> Food and Drug Administration</a>, about the time of the recall or about the time the eggs would have gone out, had issued some new regulations that probably would have intercepted the problems that we now face,” said Grassley</p>
<p>But he says Congresswoman <a href="http://delauro.house.gov/release.cfm?id=2904">Rosa DeLauro </a>does not agree and is holding congressional hearings on the situation. She is the loudest voice for food safety reforms in the House.</p>
<p>Grassley says he does agree that the FDA needs more enforcement authority.</p>
<p>“Confidence in our food is very essential for consumer safety but also for profitability for farmers. It’s not good for farmers if people have any doubts about the food supply,” said Grassley.</p>
<p>There are reports the Senate will take up the food modernization act when it returns in mid-September – that comprehensive food safety bill passed the House last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/24/congressional-reaction-to-egg-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USMEF says Mexican pork tariff a concern</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/24/usmef-says-mexican-pork-tariff-a-concern/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/24/usmef-says-mexican-pork-tariff-a-concern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Harker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Livestock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hogs/Pork]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=29137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Meat Export Federation president says he’s concerned about the US pork cuts added to Mexico’s tariff list in retaliation for the cross-border trucking dispute between Mexico and the U.S. USMEF CEO Phil Seng says even with a five percent duty, there will be a negative effect on Mexico’s meat processors and consumers. “A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://usmef.org/">US Meat Export Federation </a>president says he’s concerned about the US pork cuts added to Mexico’s tariff list in retaliation for the cross-border trucking dispute between Mexico and the U.S. USMEF CEO Phil Seng says even with a five percent duty, there will be a negative effect on Mexico’s meat processors and consumers.</p>
<p>“A lot of our pork is going in to further processing which ultimately goes to the consumers,” said Seng. “As the price of those ingredients go up it’s going to be passed on to the consumer because ultimately they are going to be paying for this.”</p>
<p>Mexico’s tariff rate is now five percent on U.S. ham and shoulder cuts and 20 percent on cooked skin pellets. All of this made worse by Mexico’s economy which is affected by the global financial downturn.</p>
<p>“The peso is weaker than it was,” said Seng. “I think then it was ten pesos to the dollar and now it’s about twelve peso to the dollar. Just with the exchange rate alone when you take a look at this, this is going to exact a toll on the Mexican consumers.”</p>
<p>While others are downplaying the effect on the US pork industry, Seng says markets are volatile and can change.</p>
<p>“Whether it’s one percent or five percent, anything that is taking a pound of meat away from our exporters or taking a dollar out of our producer&#8217;s pockets is something we have to be very concerned about,” said Seng.</p>
<p>While the U.S. is by far the largest foreign supplier of pork to Mexico, Seng says it should not take the position for granted. The tariffs on U.S. pork do not apply to other pork exporting countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/24/usmef-says-mexican-pork-tariff-a-concern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AgFeed buying M2P2</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/23/agfeed-buying-m2p2/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/23/agfeed-buying-m2p2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hogs/Pork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=29084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the largest pork production companies in China, AgFeed is buying Ames, Iowa-based hog producer M2P2 LLC for a reported $26 million. The price is $10 million more than originally reported. The deal will be 49 percent cash, 12 percent in AgFeed stock and the rest with a 10-year seller note. AgFeed has also announced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the largest pork production companies in China, <a href="http://www.agfeedinc.com/">AgFeed</a> is buying Ames, Iowa-based hog producer <a href="http://www.m2p2.com/index.aspx">M2P2 LLC</a> for a reported $26 million. The price is $10 million more than originally reported. The deal will be 49 percent cash, 12 percent in AgFeed stock and the rest with a 10-year seller note. AgFeed has also announced it is buying back up to $5 million of its outstanding stock. The two companies formed a joint venture in 2009.</p>
<p>With sow operations in Colorado, Oklahoma, and North Carolina, and finishing operations centered in Iowa, M2P2 will produce 1,300,000 pigs annually.</p>
<p>AgFeed is a U.S. company with operations primarily in China. AgFeed has two business lines &#8212; animal nutrients in premix, concentrates and complete feeds and hog production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/23/agfeed-buying-m2p2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let the bidding begin for Potash Corp</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/let-the-bidding-begin-for-potash-corp/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/let-the-bidding-begin-for-potash-corp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=28999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There may be other suitors for Potash Corp. Earlier this week Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan rejected an unsolicited bid from BHP Billiton for $130 per share. Potash described the $38.6 billion bid as “grossly inadequate”. Now it seems there are others interested in buying the world’s largest potash supplier including several Chinese interests. China is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be other suitors for Potash Corp. Earlier this week Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan rejected an unsolicited bid from BHP Billiton for $130 per share. Potash described the $38.6 billion bid as “grossly inadequate”. Now it seems there are others interested in buying the world’s largest potash supplier including several Chinese interests. China is a big Potash customer. Potash Corp CEO Bill Doyle says they are not opposed to a sale but they are “opposed to a steal of the company.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/let-the-bidding-begin-for-potash-corp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheese added to Mexican tariff list too</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/cheese-added-to-mexican-tariff-list-too/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/cheese-added-to-mexican-tariff-list-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dairy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hogs/Pork]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=28994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Dairy Export Council expressing disappointment with the announcement that Mexico will impose 20 to 25 percent tariffs on some cheese imported from the United States. Last week Mexico announced it is going to change the list of items targeted for retaliatory tariffs for failing to allow Mexican trucks to operate north of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Dairy Export Council expressing disappointment with the announcement that Mexico will impose 20 to 25 percent tariffs on some cheese imported from the United States. Last week Mexico announced it is going to change the list of items targeted for retaliatory tariffs for failing to allow Mexican trucks to operate north of the border under the NAFTA agreement. Added to the list are cheddar, Mozzarella, Gouda, Provolone, Colby, Monterey Jack, cream cheese and many others.</p>
<p>Mexico is our largest cheese export customer buying 44 million pounds of the targeted lines in the first six months of this year which is on pace to exceed the average 77 million pounds per year in 2008 and 2009.</p>
<p>Like the pork industry which has also found itself now on the list, dairy interests are calling on Congress and the Obama Administration to quickly resolve the trucking issue. The U.S. trucking industry opposes allowing Mexican trucks full access to U.S. highways citing safety concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/cheese-added-to-mexican-tariff-list-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm Bureau criticizes U.S. inaction on Mexican trucks issue</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/farm-bureau-u-s-inaction-on-mexican-trucks-issue-unacceptable/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/farm-bureau-u-s-inaction-on-mexican-trucks-issue-unacceptable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events/Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA/Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFBF/ American Farm Bureau Federation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=28941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Farm Bureau Federation is criticizing the administration and Congress for its inaction on the Mexican truck issue, which has resulted in Mexico imposing new tariffs on U.S. pork, certain types of U.S. cheese and other farm goods. Farm Bureau president Bob Stallman says the U.S. government is not meeting its obligations under NAFTA.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.fb.org/index.php?fuseaction=newsroom.newsfocus&amp;year=2010&amp;file=nr0819.html">American Farm Bureau Federation </a>is criticizing the administration and Congress for its inaction on the Mexican truck issue, which has resulted in Mexico imposing new tariffs on U.S. pork, certain types of U.S. cheese and other farm goods.</p>
<p>Farm Bureau president Bob Stallman says the U.S. government is not meeting its obligations under NAFTA.  He says Mexico is one of the United States’ best trading partners and allowing the dispute to continue is “unacceptable”. </p>
<p>Mexico has imposed the tariffs because, under NAFTA, Mexican motor carriers are allowed to transport international cargo within the U.S.  However, in early 2009, Congress failed to renew a pilot program allowing a limited number of trucks from Mexico to haul loads into the U.S. beyond a 25-mile zone.</p>
<p>Asked why the issue still hasn’t been resolved, the vice-president of international affairs for the National Pork Producers Council, Nick Giordano, says it’s politics as usual.</p>
<p>“Everything is about politics.  We’ve got mid-term elections coming up here and, you know, the unions—this is the teamsters—and the claim is Mexican trucks aren’t safe,” says Giordano.</p>
<p>That’s a bogus argument, says Giordano.</p>
<p>“All the U.S. government data—all the studies that have been done—the pilot truck project that the United States administered—everything—the Mexicans came back with a stellar safety rating,” he says.</p>
<p>Farm Bureau says that, under NAFTA, U.S. food and agriculture exports to Mexico have more than tripled, from less than four billion dollars per year prior to NAFTA to more than 12 billion dollars in 2007.  Mexico is the second largest export market for U.S. ag products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/20/farm-bureau-u-s-inaction-on-mexican-trucks-issue-unacceptable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Trade Rep, US Chamber on Mexico situation</title>
		<link>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/17/us-trade-rep-us-chamber-on-mexicos-actions/</link>
		<comments>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/17/us-trade-rep-us-chamber-on-mexicos-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Harker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA/Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Ag News/Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hogs/Pork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownfieldagnews.com/?p=28726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk says Mexico is an important U.S. export market and the administration is disappointed in that government’s decision to raise tariffs on more U.S. products because of the cross-border trucking dispute. In a statement following Mexico’s announcement, Kirk said under President Obama’s direction, he’s working with Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk says Mexico is an important U.S. export market and the administration is disappointed in that government’s decision to raise tariffs on more U.S. products because of the cross-border trucking dispute. In a statement following Mexico’s announcement, Kirk said under President Obama’s direction, he’s working with Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, and “with other agencies and stakeholders in Congress seeking to resolve (the) issue in a way that addresses safety concerns and upholds (U.S.) trade obligations.”</p>
<p>Kirk says President Obama understands the “economic pain” the tariffs cause for American farmers, companies and workers and that they’re committed to resolving the dispute with Mexico and ending those duties.</p>
<p>U.S. pork is reported to be one of the items added to the renewed list which Mexico has not yet made public.</p>
<p>According to TheTrucker.com, Patrick Kilbride with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce issued a statement saying “enough is enough” and urged the administration to end the dispute saying that the U.S. must “meet its commitment to Mexico to allow cross-border trucking services as agreed to in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/08/17/us-trade-rep-us-chamber-on-mexicos-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
