Good week for new crop soybean, wheat sales

USDA reports soybean, soybean meal, and wheat export sales for the week ending May 16 were larger than expected, with corn and soybean oil within pre-report estimates. Physical shipments of corn, soybeans, and wheat were all less than what’s needed weekly to meet USDA projections for the 2012/13 marketing year.

Wheat came out at 239,400 tons (8.8 million bushels), up 91% from the week ending May 9 and 55% higher than the four week average. Nigeria bought 105,400 tons and Brazil picked up 72,000 tons, while unknown destinations canceled on 98,600 tons. Nearing the end of the 2012/13 marketing year, wheat sales are 995.5 million bushels, compared to 1.025 billion late in 2011/12. Sales of 713,600 tons (26.2 million bushels) for 2013/14 delivery were mostly to unknown destinations (162,900 tons) and the Dominican Republic (68,100 tons).

Corn was reported at 104,600 tons (4.1 million bushels), down 52% from the previous week and 57% lower than the four week average. Mexico purchased 40,300 tons and unknown destinations bought 32,000 tons. For the 2012/13 marketing year to date, corn sales are 676.7 million bushels, compared to 1.497 billion in 2011/12. Sales of 341,600 tons (13.4 million bushels) for 2013/14 delivery were primarily to unknown destinations (205,400 tons).

Soybeans were pegged at 183,500 tons (6.7 million bushels), with unknown destinations picking up 82,800 tons and Japan purchasing 35,200 tons. So far this marketing year, soybean sales are 1.348 billion bushels, compared to 1.319 billion this time last year. Sales of 838,900 tons (30.8 million bushels) for 2013/14 delivery were mostly to China (531,000 tons) and unknown destinations (180,000 tons).

Soybean meal came out at 131,200 tons, 58% more than the prior week and 30% above the four week average. Ecuador bought 62,200 tons and unknown destinations picked up 27,300 tons, while Colombia canceled on 25,300 tons. At this point in the marketing year, soybean meal sales are 8,924,000 tons, compared to 6,731,000 tons a year ago. Sales of 125,400 tons for 2013/14 delivery were mostly to unknown destinations (75,000 tons) and Vietnam (47,000 tons).

Soybean oil was reported at 9,600 tons, with South Korea purchasing 8,000 tons and Canada cancelling on 600 tons. Cumulative 2012/13 soybean oil sales are 837,100 tons, compared to 420,500 at this point in 2011/12.

Net beef sales totaled 20,400 tons. The listed buyers were Japan (6,200 tons), Hong Kong (5,400 tons), Mexico (4,400 tons), Canada (1,800 tons), and South Korea (1,800 tons). Vietnam canceled on 1,100 tons.

Net pork sales came out at 7,200 tons. The reported purchasers were Mexico (3,000 tons), Canada (800 tons), South Korea (800 tons), China (700 tons), and Hong Kong (700 tons).

USDA issues final COOL rule

USDA has issued the final rule for mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) of beef, pork, lamb, chicken, goat meat, wild and farm-raised fish and shellfish, perishable agricultural commodities, peanuts, pecans, ginseng and macadamia nuts.

The latest rule amends the regulations for muscle cut covered commodities derived from animals slaughtered in the United States. Labels will be required to specify the production steps of birth, raising and slaughter of the animal from which the meat is derived. In addition, the rule eliminates the allowance for commingling of muscle cuts from different origins. The cost of implementing the requirements will be incurred by the primary packers and processors of the meat and retailers subject to COOL requirements.

USDA estimates 7,181 firms will need to augment labels to meet the requirement. Estimated cost for the loss of commingling flexibility at the packer/processor level is $7.16 per head of cattle and $1.79 per head of hogs. At the retail level it is estimated to cost 5 cents per pound of beef and 4.5 cents per pound of pork.

U.S. Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack says the changes “will improve the overall operation of the program and also bring the mandatory COOL requirements into compliance with U.S. international trade obligations.”

The Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization ruled last June that the U.S. COOL requirements for certain meat products discriminated against Canadian and Mexican livestock imports and were therefore in violation of WTO rules. The U.S. had until May 23rd to come into compliance. The new rules will be published in the Federal Register on Friday.

National Cattlemen’s Beef Association President Scott George issued a statement expressing disappointment with the rule saying it will not bring the U.S. into compliance with the WTO. George fears that will lead to “increased discrimination against imported products and in turn retaliatory tariffs or other authorized trade sanctions.” He adds “any retaliation against U.S. beef would be devastating for our producers.’

National Farmers Union president Roger Johnson praised the rule saying; “Legal analysis has found that this will satisfy WTO’s requirements.” Johnson says “We further applaud the administration for deciding to take a proactive approach in bringing COOL into compliance by providing more information on the origins of our food, instead of simply watering down the process.”

A copy of the rule is available here:

The full NCBA statement follows:

WASHINGTON (May 23, 2013) – The following is a statement from National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) President Scott George, a Cody, Wyo. dairy and cattle producer, regarding today’s announcement that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a final rule regarding the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling Rule (MCOOL).

“We are deeply disappointed with this short-sighted action by the USDA. Our largest trading partners have already said that these provisions will not bring the United States into compliance with our WTO obligations and will result in increased discrimination against imported products and in turn retaliatory tariffs or other authorized trade sanctions. As we said in comments submitted to USDA, ‘any retaliation against U.S. beef would be devastating for our producers.’ While trying to make an untenable mandate fit with our international trade obligations, USDA chose to set up U.S. cattle producers for financial losses. Moreover, this rule will place a greater record-keeping burden on producers, feeders and processors through the born, raised and harvested label.”

“As cattlemen and women, we do not oppose voluntary labeling as a marketing tool to distinguish product and add value. However, USDA is not the entity that we want marketing beef, and on its face, a label that says ‘harvested’ is unappealing to both consumers and cattle producers.”

NFU statement follows:

WASHINGTON (May 23, 2013) – The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a final rule governing Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) to meet compliance requirements set forth by a recent World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling. National Farmers Union (NFU) President Roger Johnson issued a statement following the decision:

“We are very pleased that the USDA has decided to stand strong and keep COOL. The decision to bring the law into compliance with the WTO’s ruling is a win-win situation for all interested parties.

“We further applaud the administration for deciding to take a proactive approach in bringing COOL into compliance by providing more information on the origins of our food, instead of simply watering down the process.

“NFU has been a long time supporter of COOL and we will continue to vigorously support it. Consumers want and have the right to know where their food comes from.”

USDA’s final rule will require labels for certain foods, particularly muscle cuts of meat, to include the countries in which the animal was born, raised and slaughtered. Legal analysis has found that this will satisfy WTO’s requirements and meets the compliance deadline of May 23, 2013.

COOL response is due today

Today (Thursday) is the deadline as set by the World Trade Organization (WTO) for the U.S. to respond on Country of Origin Labeling (COOL).

But Colin Woodall of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association says it’s unclear what USDA is actually going to propose to the WTO.

“We had initially thought that they would move forward with the proposed rule that they put out in March that changed to a three-tier labeling structure,” Woodall says, “where you have to put where the animal was born, raised and processed.

But Woodall says a recent development has clouded the picture even more.

“Just last week that rule went back over to OMB and has been changed,” he says. “It’s now been considered ‘economically significant’—that means that they expect it to have over a hundred-million dollar impact on our industry.

“So we don’t know whether or not that will delay the opportunity to get this submitted tomorrow (Thursday).”

So, Woodall says, one of two things could happen—neither one of them positive, from NCBA’s perspective.

“We either submit something and we go through a dispute process to determine whether or not it actually meets the criteria of the WTO—or if we don’t submit something, then we set up a situation where Canada and Mexico could accelerate their retaliation against us.

“I think in either scenario we expect Canada and Mexico to retaliate against the United States.”

Woodall says that retaliation could include retaliatory tariffs against beef, pork and other commodities.

Senate defeats sugar policy reform

On a 55 to 45 vote, the Senate defeated an attempt to change the sugar policy in the next farm bill. An amendment cosponsored by Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Mark Kirk (R-Ill) and Patrick Toomey (R-PA)

Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH, Mark Kirk, R-Ill., Patrick Toomey, R-Pa., would have made changes to a program opponents charge restricts imports causing artificially high sugar prices at taxpayer expense. Francis Smith with the Competitive Enterprise Institute says; “Americans are hit with higher prices for a wide variety of foodstuffs, while also paying the costs of a massive regulatory bureaucracy.”

In a statement after the vote, the American Sugar Alliance thanked the Senators who voted against the amendment saying, “It would have led to chronic oversupplies of sugar on the U.S. market, jeopardizing jobs and economic activity in rural America. It would have given heavily subsidized foreign sugar producers an unfair competitive advantage over Americans and left us more dependent on foreign suppliers for a food staple.”

The House Ag Committee farm bill includes the current sugar policy.

Wisconsin conservation funds restored

The Wisconsin State Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee has voted to restore funding for County Conservation staff. Governor Scott Walker’s proposed budget cuts $998,600 from funding for County Conservationists. The State pays toward three positions in each county, 100% of the first, 70% of the second and 50% of each subsequent position.

The Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters program director Anne Sayers praising the Joint Finance Committee for reinstating the funding noting “our lakes, rivers and streams can’t protect themselves. Every day county conservationists are on the front lines working to prevent runoff that leads to polluted water and stinky lakes.”  Sayers adds the fuding still faces some hurdles in the state budget process, “but we are grateful to the members of the Joint Finance Committee who stood up for Wisconsin’s County Conservationists.”

Pork, chicken supplies larger than expected

According to USDA, the supplies of red meat and poultry at the end of April were up on the month and year, with pork and chicken both topping pre-report estimates.

On April 30, 2013, pork in cold storage was 698.816 million pounds, up 8% on the month and 6% on the year, a new end of April record and considerably larger than the average guess of 658.5 million pounds, via Dow Jones Newswires. That bigger than expected number for pork is primarily due to slow export demand.

Beef came out at 510.010 million pounds, slightly lower than the previous month and down 2% from last year, when analysts were anticipating supplies would be just about unchanged from a year ago. The average estimate was 517.7 million pounds.

The total amount of red meat in cold storage was pegged at 1.236 billion pounds, an increase of 5% on the month and 3% on the year.

Chicken in cold storage was reported at 668.796 million pounds, 8% more than last month and 11% larger than last year, and above the average estimate of 640 million pounds.

Poultry totaled 1.130 billion pounds, up 11% on the month and 8% on the year.

USDA’s red meat and poultry livestock numbers are out Thursday at 3 PM Eastern/2 PM Central.

Cong. Gibbs named ‘Soy Champion’

The American Soybean Association (ASA) has presented Ohio 7th District Congressman Bob Gibbs with the organization’s ‘Soy Champion Award.’ Gibbs was recognized for his advocacy for soybean farmers and soybean related issues on Capitol Hill.

“ASA is proud to recognize Congressman Gibbs as a Soy Champion for his outstanding advocacy on behalf of soybean farmers. His work on waterways and regulatory issues, as well as on the farm bill, has proven critical not only to my fellow soybean farmers and I, but to the agriculture community as a whole,” said Danny Murphy, ASA President.

 

Five-year Farm Bill is a necessity

The full Senate began debate on the Farm Bill earlier this week.  Indiana Senator Joe Donnelly says it is moving along well.  “It has momentum,” he says.  “We had a strong vote coming out of the committee itself so I’m looking for a five-year farm bill.”

Yesterday the Senate voted on the amount of cuts to the nutrition programs.  “There were some amendments to take cuts out of crop insurance instead,” he says. “You know what on the nutrition cuts – we’re working really hard make sure those cuts are ones that are sensible, that won’t eliminate any nutrition for our children and others.  But at the same time, we have to make sure we have crop insurance.”

Donnelly tells Brownfield he’s thinks this Farm Bill will be good for Indiana’s farmers.  “We were able to work through what we call Farm Flex, which provides planting flexibility for all of our farmers,” he says.  “I kind of held the line on that and said, ‘look we have to make sure this program continues’ so we were able to keep that in place.”

He thinks a vote on the Farm Bill is not too far away.  “I’d like to tell you today – but you never know,” he says.  “We’re ready to go.  We’re ready to move forward and I’m hoping to have a vote here really soon.”

AUDIO: Senator Joe Donnelly, Farm Bill (3:50mp3)

Dueling amendments to expand and to reverse SNAP cuts fail

Opposing efforts to reverse and to expand food assistance cuts both failed on the Senate floor Tuesday. While Senator Kristin Gillibrand from New York pleaded to restore $4 billion worth of cuts to the food stamp program, Kansas Senator Pat Roberts urged deeper cuts to those benefits.

“My goal is simple,” Roberts said on the Senate floor Tuesday, “restore integrity to the supplemental nutrition assistance program in a common sense and comprehensive manner. Enacting this package of reforms will allow the federal government to continue to help those who truly need SNAP food benefits and assistance”

Over the course of a decade Roberts’ amendment would have cut about $30 billion from the food stamp program.

Meanwhile, Senator Gillibrand’s amendment would have reversed the $4 billion in cuts to SNAP benefits agreed to in the Senate Agriculture Committee last week. She maintains that the program experiences only about 1 percent in waste. On the other hand she says food stamps contribute to the economy.

“This money goes straight to the grocery stores, to the store clerks, to the truckers who haul the food from producers all across the country,” said Gillibrand. “Sixteen cents of every SNAP dollar actually goes right back to the farmer who grew the crop, according to the USDA.”

Gillibrand’s proposed fund restoration would have been offset by cuts in crop insurance reimbursements. Both amendments failed on the Senate floor.

Wisconsin gets some gypsy moth spraying done

The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture started spraying for the gypsy moth Tuesday morning. DATCP reports spraying was completed as scheduled in Rock and Green/Dane counties and at several sites in Lafayette and Iowa counties. Under a separate program managed by the Department of Natural Resources, spraying also was completed at Governor Dodge State Park.

Due to deteriorating weather conditions, spraying was not completed at three sites in Lafayette County and one site in Iowa County, nor at any of the scheduled sites in Crawford and Grant counties.

Spraying has been rescheduled for Wednesday in these areas, weather-permitting.