I wonder how many people have duct tape stockpiled in an effort to be prepared for a bio-terrorism incident in the United States? I know many people who have water and food stored in case of some sort of emergency. If it brings those who do a sense of security for themselves and their families, I say “good for them.”
Here in the Midwest, far from the “mean streets” of the big city, I often feel insulated from evil acts of terrorism. The chance that I or someone I know will fall victim to an attack of this nature is only a remote possibility, but it is a possibility, and that leaves a feeling of uneasiness in the pit of my stomach.
Along with the agricultural journalists that work for me, I have conducted interviews with representatives from state and national commodity groups, departments of agriculture, state and federal Environmental Protection Agencies, and departments of homeland security, asking them to help us help our listeners during times of heightened awareness for increased personal and farm security.
According to many of the experts we’ve interviewed, the greatest security risk to farms, greenhouses and nurseries where plants are grown is the unauthorized access to farm chemicals and application equipment. We all know that pesticides should be stored away from children and pets. Pesticides should also be secure from trespassers, vandals and thieves who may inadvertently or intentionally use these chemicals to harm themselves, other people, crop or non-crop lands and the environment. We are also encouraged to keep our eyes open for “suspicious activity.” What does that mean? Any activity “out of the ordinary” by your employees; signs of tampering with equipment or facilities; strangers showing an interest in your operation – authorized or not. For the most part, I’m told, I’ll recognize suspicious activity when I see it.
Experts tell us that good security and bio-security practices are important no matter what size of farm you have. Terrorism does occur in rural areas; on farms and ranches.
Last month, animal rights terrorists set digitally controlled incendiary devices (bombs on timers) beneath 14 cattle trucks and trailers at the Harris Ranch feed yard near Coalinga, California. All of the trucks were destroyed, but thank God no people were injured.
The cowards who committed this act of terrorism did so to protest what they called “the horrors and injustice of factory farming.”
By U.S. standards, the Harris Ranch feedlot is large. As a matter of fact, it is the 14th largest in the country with a capacity of 100-thousand head. But these animal rights terrorists don’t give a rip about size or species. They don’t care if yours is a small farm in the Midwest. They don’t care that you do not finish cattle in a feed yard. These criminals don’t care if your hens are cage free. They don’t care that you do not use gestation stalls for your sows.
They don’t eat meat and do not want you to eat meat. Many believe that an animal has the same rights as a human being.
We need to do more than stockpile duct tape, friends, because these terrorists have promised to attack again.

Latest: 
Horse slaughter a contentious issue
Commentary.
Language that ended domestic horse slaughter and processing in the United States was removed from the Ag Appropriations bill approved by the House/Senate Conference committee. The bill passed and was signed by the President, so horses can be processed in this country today.
Brownfield’s Julie Harker produced 3 stories on this subject, drawing many comments to the Brownfield website. As a matter of fact, one of the other broadcasters jokingly accused her of trying to “blow up” the site due to the numerous and quite often lengthy comments posted there.
The poll question on the Brownfield Ag News website, “Should horse slaughter/processing be brought back to the U.S.?” drew responses from almost 800 people in less than 72 hours. That’s about 10 times more than we normally receive in response to a poll question in that time frame.
Horse slaughter is a contentious issue in the U.S. Whether you favor or are opposed to horse slaughter and processing, chances are pretty good that you are willing to, as Tom Steever says, “get up on your hind legs” to passionately voice your opinion on the matter. Many people in this country fail to see horses as livestock, but instead view them in the same category as a puppy or a kitten. They believe horses are pets.
I support lifting the federal ban on horse slaughter. I support it because I believe that horses are livestock and that livestock harvested at state and federally inspected processing plants in this country are killed in a humane manner. I believe it was inhumane to close those plants in the first place, as that action doomed many horses to abandonment and neglect.
Have you ever seen a horse that is dying of starvation? I promise you, it is not something you want to see.
Earlier this year, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on horse welfare and slaughter that confirmed significant problems with the current restrictions. Among other things, the report said the closing of U.S. domestic horse processing facilities in 2007 has caused the value of lower-to-medium priced horses to fall as much as 21 percent—and it says the economic downturn has caused another four to five percent drop in horse prices.
Anti-animal agriculture groups were behind the 2007 ban on horse slaughter as they have been behind so many other actions sold to the public as “more humane.” However, the GAO report points out the number of horses exported to Mexican processing plants rose 660 percent from 2006 to 2010. Mexico does not have the same regulations in place for humane slaughter of livestock that are in place in the United States.
Al Tank, former CEO of the National Pork Producers said years ago that activist groups are like lions hunting zebras on the Serengeti plains. They work together as a pride, to single out one animal and work together as a pack to take it down. We didn’t know at the time that horses would be the activist groups first “kill.”
Yet, here were are today with the opportunity to begin repairing the damages caused by the 2007 ban on horse processing in this country. If we continue to work together as farmers, as ranchers, as stockmen, as agribusiness and other supporters – we will not be singled out and taken down.
Cyndi Young’s 2 Cents 12022011