Friday 27th January 2012

Sweetener tax in DC budget

The Washington DC council has voted to include a six-percent sales tax on artificially and sugar-sweetened drinks in their 2011 budget. The tax would apply to soft drinks, sports drinks and energy drinks, but not drinks containing milk, juice, coffee or tea.

It is expected to raise about $7.92 million a year. The final vote on the 2011 budget is scheduled for June; if it passes it then goes to the mayor for his signature and must be approved by Congress.

Other municipalities have attempted sweetener taxes in what some claim is an effort to reduce childhood obesity but also a way to help generate income for financially-strapped governments. Such taxes have met with staunch opposition from the sweetener and beverage industries.

Three sick from Minnesota raw milk

A Minnesota raw milk operation has been shut down after milk from the farm has been linked to E.coli contamination and illness. State officials say three people have become sick including a toddler who has been hospitalized with what are described as “life-threatening” conditions after consuming products from Hartman Dairy Farm, also marketed as M.O.M.’s (Minnesota Organic Milk) of Gibbon. A fourth case is also being investigated as to whether it is linked to the farm.

The Minnesota Department of Health urges anyone who may have recently purchased milk from the Hartmann Dairy Farm or M.O.M.’s, to throw it away. “The milk may be labeled organic and consumers may be unaware that the milk has not been pasteurized. In addition, consumers should not eat cheese, ice cream or other dairy products from the farm, which also may have been made from raw, unpasteurized milk.”

Minnesota law prohibits most raw milk sales, except for occasional purchases directly at the farm where the milk is produced.

Farmer delivers EPA message at seminar

Iowa farmer John Andrew just wrapped up a two-year term on the EPA’s Farm, Ranch and Rural Community Advisory Committee. He told participants of a Greenhouse Gas Regulation Seminar in Missouri on Thursday when he asked the EPA for guidance on potential GHG regulations…he got a two sentence reply, “There would be no EPA actions on greenhouse gases that would affect agriculture until 2016 at the earliest. And that it would all be pending on climate change legislation that is presently pending.”

The consensus at the University of Missouri Briemyer Seminar is that climate change legislation will NOT pass in 2010.

Meanwhile, the Murkowski resolution of disapproval against the EPA’s plan to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act reportedly has been scheduled for a vote in the Senate on June 10th.

Bayer offers new biological seed-applied nematode product

Starting with the 2011 crop year, Bayer Crop Science will offer Poncho/Votivo, a new seed-applied insect/nematode protection product for corn and soybeans.  The nematode protection is provided by Votivo.  It’s a biological, with the bacteria forming a protective barrier around the young roots of the plant.  We discussed Poncho-Votivo with Bayer’s product development manager for seed treatment, Jennifer Riggs.

AUDIO: Jennifer Riggs (7 min MP3)

Silence = Guilt

Commentary.

I’m breaking a cardinal rule of journalism as I write this, namely, when angry or upset with a situation, take a few minutes to calm down before you start banging on a keyboard.  But in this case, I can’t.  I just watched the Mercy for Animals (MFA)undercover video allegedly filmed at an Ohio dairy. The images therein are horrific.

Several thoughts are ricocheting around in my head. The first is that all of animal agriculture must loudly and publicly condemn this episode. Such barbarity cannot be tolerated and to remain silent is akin to abetting the wonton cruelty shown in the video. The second thought is this: How long did MFA wait before acting on this video? Reports are MFA “documented” this horror for a month before releasing the video. Then the political side of my brain automatically goes to the guarantee the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) will try and exploit this to its own political ends, and lastly, my sheer frustration such video will be used to paint all farmers and ranchers as villains and worse.

While I’m a big believer in innocent until proven guilty — experience tells us the video must first be authenticated — if the alleged perpetrator of the acts portrayed in the video is found guilty by a court of law, then the full force of the law must be brought to bear. But I’m also infuriated by the actions or inaction of the animal rights movement, starting with HSUS and its Hallmark video, to this latest example. How can any group which calls itself “humane” sit on any evidence of cruelty for a month, or in the case of HSUS, nearly 90 days, allowing the mistreatment continue? Is the publicity and political value of such video more important than the alleged suffering of the animals? Apparently. But why isn’t isn’t the failure to act considered complicity? Where at least is the moral obligation to act immediately? Why are regulators and law enforcement timid in pursuing this?

HSUS is exploiting this video, saying the situation depicted is due to the “anemic state of Ohio’s anti-cruelty laws,” and then automatically pitches its statewide ballot initiative to try and blunt the success of the Ohio Livestock Standards Board. This is typical and sad.

But ultimately, the responsibility is ours, and by “ours” I mean everyone even remotely involved in animal agriculture. We have the same moral obligation to report abuse, neglect or illegal actions. We cannot and must not tolerate bad actors, and that includes taking every action at our disposal to intervene, including notifying authorities when all else fails. American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) President Bob Stallman said it best: “Farmers and ranchers know it is their responsibility to do everything in their power to prevent abuse…and as member of the ag community, they know they are responsible to stop any such actions when brought to their attention — including alerting appropriate law enforcement officials.”

Every producer, processor and transporter, no matter how large or small, must ensure that every breathing human working with live animals understands the moral, ethical, legal and economic obligations inherent in such work. Hiring temporary or day labor is no excuse. If they work for you, they must be trained in proper animal handling and treatment. No exceptions, no excuses. And if you don’t fulfill this responsibility, then you can be accused of being at least morally as guilty as the person who commits the abuse.

The episodes in the MFA video are in no way representative of anything I know in animal ag, and I question the sanity of anyone who believes differently. And for any animal rights group to claim such cruelty is routine would be akin to me saying anyone who’s a member of any animal rights, protection or welfare group is some kind of bomb throwing, fire-setting extremist simply because a precious few activists have chosen to embrace those tactics.

I am asked repeatedly at speeches and presenations, “What do we do about the bad actors?” It’s simple. If you know they’re bad actors, then intervene, individually or get your organization involved. If the bad actor won’t listen, make sure they understand the legal consequences of their deafness.

Again, Stallman said it best: “People who abuse farm animals don’t deserve a spot in the ag community.”

Farmer plants soybeans early for higher yields

Duane Lee farms near Albion in east-central Nebraska, where he raises dryland corn, soybeans and some alfalfa.  Duane is also a director on the Nebraska Soybean Board, which has been funding University of Nebraska research on how growers can better utilize sunlight by planting their soybeans earlier.  Duane decided to give it a try this year and had all of his beans in the ground by April 29—a good one to two weeks earlier than normal.

AUDIO: Duane Lee (3 min MP3)

An NCBA official confirms that EPA is targeting CAFOs

Reports out of northwest Iowa this spring indicate that the EPA has stepped up its investigations of cattle feeding operations, particularly those feedlots of one-thousand head or less.  It’s a concern to those small to medium-sized Iowa cattle feeders, but Tamara Thies, chief environmental counsel for the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association in Washington, says they’re not alone.  Thies also talks about the negative undercurrent running through the EPA—a disdain for what some within the EPA refer to as “industrial agriculture.”

AUDIO: Tamara Thies (3 min MP3)

Outside markets support corn, soybeans and wheat

Soybeans were higher on short covering, bull spreading and technical buying along with spillover from the outside markets. The dollar was lower while the Dow and crude oil were sharply higher. Also, there have been reports of commercial firms canceling on deliveries due to right old crop supplies and the cash basis is strong, but good crop weather did limit gains. Soybean meal and oil were higher on spillover from beans and short covering. The Census Bureau showed April’s soybean crush at 136.546 million bushels, down on the month and the year, with bean oil stocks up on the month and year at 3.355 billion pounds and meal stocks down on both the month and year at 265,352 short tons. According to Dow Jones Newswires, USDA and Chinese officials have agreed to discuss resolving issues over quality standards for U.S. soybeans in hopes of avoiding more shipping and unloading delays. The Buenos Aires Grain Exchange reports 93% of Argentina’s soybeans are harvested.

Corn was higher on technical buying and outside market direction. Old crop export sales were solid and there was also a bit of borrowed momentum from soybeans. However, the gains were limited by a net reduction for new crop exports following cancellations by China and good development weather. Ethanol futures were higher. Cargill solid 55,000 tons of U.S. No. 2 yellow corn to the Korea Corn Processing Industry Association at $236 per ton. According to the Buenos Aires Grain Exchange, 80% of the corn crop in Argentina is harvested with the crop pegged at 21.7 million tons.

The wheat complex was higher on technical buying, short covering and the lower dollar. Contracts were due for a bounce and traders continue to hold a huge net short position. Also, fundamentals may be negative, but the trade seems to be ignoring that at this point. European wheat was mixed on concerns that recent rainfall was not enough to break dry conditions in some areas of the U.K. and France; Paris November was up .3% and London November was down .7%. The Buenos Aires Grain Exchange reports 12% of Argentina’s wheat crop is planted. Japan bought 131,000 tons of wheat (49,000 tons U.S. dark northern spring, 22,000 tons U.S. western white, 21,000 tons Australian standard white, 20,000 tons Canadian western red spring and 19,000 tons U.S. hard red winter), Tunisia purchased 100,000 tons of optional origin soft wheat and Egypt is tendering for up to 120,000 tons of wheat. Iraq’s Grain Board, via Dow Jones Newswires, says it will not import more wheat this year with the 2010 total at 1.43 million tons and this year’s harvest expected to top 2.2 million tons.

DBA to present Environmental Excellence Award

The Dairy Business Association is going to present an Environmental Excellence Award at World Dairy Expo this year. The award will be given to a Wisconsin Farmer as recognition for outstanding waste and pollution prevention projects that have been designed to protect Wisconsin’s natural resources. DBA says the goal is to “showcase one producer each year that chooses to go above and beyond the environmental standards to improve the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the land we utilize.”

Applications are available on their website or by calling DBA at 920-347-0499. Entry deadline in September 7th, the award will be presented September 30th at World Dairy Expo.

Bill seeks to exempt milk from oil spill prevention plan

Michigan Congresswoman Candice Miller has introduced legislation to direct the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) to change their designation of milk as an environmental hazard. Under the Clean Water Act, the EPA instituted a program called the Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Program which directs producers to have an oil spill prevention plan (SPCC plan). The goal is to prevent oil from entering the navigable waters of the United States. However, the EPA rule states that because milk contains a certain percentage of animal fat, which is a non-petroleum oil, it is considered to be oil for the purposes of the SPCC program and should therefore require a facility that stores, transfers or uses milk to develop and implement an SPCC plan.

Before leaving office, the Bush Administration published an exemption to the rule for dairy but that exemption was put on hold when President Obama froze such actions upon taking office. Representative Miller’s bill would force the EPA to finalize the exemption.

Read Miller’s statement here: